English Imperialism and Representations Essay Example for Free

English Imperialism and Representations EssayIn William Shakespe argons The storm Prospero, an exiled Naples duke, and his daughter, Miranda, are marooned on a remote island with the alone(predicate) natal1 inhabitant, a sentient being man named Caliban. Through his sorcery Prospero is able to enslave Caliban, the indigene, who toils for the benefit of Prospero and Miranda, the usurping colonial powers. While it is unclear if Shakespeare think The disturbance to mirror English imperialism during the new sixteenth and 17th century, t here are many congruencies amidst events in the pass and events around the time of the plays rootage performance in 1611. To suffer with, in order to analyze these congruencies a brief overview of Englands unused realness2 exploration and colonization is necessary. Next, Gonzalos sake in the island and his grove scheme gild the English imperial yearning for the New macrocosm. In addition, the kickoff exchange surrounded by Caliban a nd Prospero encapsulate the conflicts of indigenous sight and the colonisers in an imperial relationship. Fin bothy, the question the Great Compromiser if Caliban acts specific everyy native-born Americans or broadly represents subjugated indigenous the great unwashed by English colonization.Shakespeares The storm metaphorically represents English imperialism and encapsulates English sentiments towards the New domain of a function during the time of its cultural production. During the life of Shakespeare, specially around the time of the first performance of The Tempest, Europe engaged in imperialistic activities through surface the New World. In addition, during Shakespeares lifetime, Englands imperialistic activities would play a larger role in the plains interests and developments. In Alden T.Vaughan article community of Wonder England Encounters the New Worlds endemic, Vaughan describes how English perceptions of the indigen Americans developed over the course of the 16th century. The English, while interested in the New World, did non play an active role in its initial exploration English flock in the Tudor period lagged noniceably behind other Europeans in learning around the Americas. For nearly a century, English interest in the New World was surprisingly tangential, more a matter of curiosity than of conquest and establish primarily on foreign rather than on English observation (Vaughan, People, 13).For a majority of the 16th century the English received second hand accounts (writings and illustrations) of the New World. However, the English did make limited forays into create first hand knowledge of the New World. Vaughan states, The first document contact amongst the English and the Indians occurred in about 1502, when Sebastian Cabotbrought back three men taken from Newfoundland (People, 14), further he continues, Not until 1530, apparently, were other Indians brought to England, and not until 1553 did an English publisher is sue a book with appreciable attention to Americas inhabitants (People, 14).While heavy to capitalize on exploring and colonizing the New World, the English became actively involved in the exploration and conquest of the Americas and its peoples. Thereafter, Englands image of American natives reflected uniquely English experiences and expectations (Vaughan, People, 13). One of the significant imperialist ventures around the time Shakespeare wrote The Tempest was the Jamestown dependency. The English founded Jamestown in 1607, four years prior to the first performance of The Tempest.While a modern critic can only speculate the extent which the New World tantalized and influenced the English during this time, it must construct had somewhat sway on the popular imagi terra firma of English society, including Shakespeares. In The Tempest, the character Gonzalo demonstrates an interest with the native island setting that represents English imperial yearnings. After being shipwrecked on the island, Gonzalo first notices the natural beauty of the island. He exclaims, How lush and lusty the grass looks How green (2. 1. 53).From his initial observation of the health of the island, Gonzalos interest in the island soon becomes opportunistic Had I plantation of this isle, my lord (2. 1. 140).When Gonzalo says plantation, he means colonization. Gonzalo initial admiration for the island transforms into a scheme to start a colony he envisions his colony as the antithesis of industry, a utopic society of idling. Gonzalo describes his plantation in the following manner I the common wealth I would by contraries Execute all liaisons for no kind of traffic, Would I admit no name of magistrate, Letter should not be know riches, poverty, And use of service, none contract, succession, Bourn, bound of land, tilth, vineyard, none No use of metal, corn, or wine, or oilNo occupations all men idle, all, And women too, save innocent and pure No sovereignty (2. 1. 144-52) In Gonza los colony people just lie around with no one telling them what to do in addition, the women all stay virgins. Gonzalos companions quick point out the impossibility of his Eden-like scenario. Sebastian indicates, Yet Gonzalo would be king on the island (2. 1. 153) to which Antonio adds, The latter end of his commonwealth forgets the beginning (2. 1. 154).From the comments by Sebastian and Antonio, it is clear Gonzalos scheme is not practical, hardly certainly Gonzalos sentiment must have appealed idealistically to English and Europeans tired of the complaisant ruckus in the Old World. Benjamin Bertram notes in The age is out of Joint Skepticism in Shakespeares England present-day(a) to Shakespeares life, Londons mercantile interests, unemployment, overpopulation, and immigrants from the province all made colonial ventures appealing (58). Gonzalos fantasizing business leader tap into the socioeconomic conditions contemporary to the time of cultural production of The Tempest.Fo r some Europeans the mixer turmoil of the Old World was a sore spot, yearning like Gonzalo for a fresh start and for a soften society in the New World. French courtier Michel De Montaigne in his essay Of the Cannibals (1580) argues the New World inhabitants are no more barbarous or savage than the Old World denizens, suggesting things might be better in the case of the former. De Montaigne establishes, I find (as far as I have been informed) there is nix in that nation the American Indians, that is either barbarous or savage, unless men call that barbarism which is not common to them (119).De Montaigne alludes to the social problems of 16th century Europe in pointing out the hypocrisy of the Old World labeling the New World as barbarous or savage. Moreover, De Montaigne sees the New World inhabitants as close set(predicate) to a natural state and less tainted by human wit when he observes, It is a nationthat hath no kind of traffic, no knowledge of letters, no intelligence of n umbers, no name of magistrates, nor of politic favorable position no use of service, of riches, or of poverty no contracts, no successions, but common, no apparel but natural, no manuring of lands, no use of wine, corn, or metal (120).Curiously, both Gonzalo and De Montaigne evoke the idea of unfettered idleness and non-use of wine, corn, and metal as a more natural society. Also, in painting an idyllic picture of the social items supposedly absent from the New World, De Montaigne overlooks that corn is a New World vegetable and that American Indians were beaten(prenominal) with the practice of fertilization, although maybe not mannuring. While a lot of De Montaignes generalizations of the New World inhabitants are arguable, he calls the readers attention to a litany of social items as evidence of the Old World tainted by human wit. However, De Montaigne sarcastically concludes that what the American Indians, supposedly, do with their dead is no more barbaric than what the Europe ans do with the aliveness by torturing people, stating there is more barbarism in eating men alive than to carry upon them being dead to mangle by tortures and torments a body full of lively sense, to roast him in pieces, to make dogs and swine to gnaw and tear him in mammocksthan to roast and eat him after he is dead (120).De Montaignes relativistic view of transatlantic cultural practices demonstrates culture in the Old World was not ineluctably better than culture in the New World. Some Europeans might have yearned for a reprieve from the crocked trapping of the Old World the New World to them might have represented an opportunity for a fresh start, a chance to create a utopic society. The only problem was what to do about the indigenous people already there. The English public had a growing interest in the New World during Shakespeares lifetime, and The Tempest almost predicts the course of English imperialism would take.The exchange amidst Caliban and Prospero in Act 1 Sce ne 2 metaphorically represents the underlying conflicts plaguing indigenous people and English colonizers. Caliban represents archetypical native Other3 as he argues against Prospero, the colonial master. Calibans articulation that he is the rightful owner of the island sounds like the universal account of many colonise people This islands mine, by Sycorax my mother, / Which thou takst from me (1. 2. 335-6).Calibans ownership stems from his mother, a witch, who fag out him on the island, and this claim is reminiscent of many indigenous people who trace their social beginnings through a creation myth fixing them to the land. As Caliban goes on, his description of the initial friendly relationship he had with Prospero, parallels the prototypical dealings amid indigenous people and colonizers. Often this friendly period includes an exchange of items and information between the two parties. Caliban describes the followingWhen thou camst first, Thou strokst me and made much of me, wo uldst give me Water and berries int, and apprize me how To name the bigger light, and how the less, That burn by day and night. And then I loved thee And showed thee all the qualities o th isle, The fresh springs, brine pits, barren place and fertile. (1. 2. 337-43) Caliban attests he showed Prospero the qualities of the island, and in essence, Caliban taught Prospero how to survive on the island. This token interestingly parallels the situation in Jamestown. B. J. Sokol in A support New World of companionship points out that sojourning Europeans almost but depended upon the services of native inhabitants for material survival, and especially for food (83).This grace period between indigenous people and colonizers, however, does not last forever. Sokol continues, In both The Tempest and Virginia these services had at first been voluntarily offered by aboriginal Americans, then they were purchased or extorted, and finally there was refusal, resistance, and rebellion (83). Soon the colonizer presses for more resources, more control over the land, and more control over the indigenous people soon the indigenous people become the colonized.Caliban describes himself from the position of the colonized, For I am all the subjects that you have, / Which first was mine own kin and here you sty me / In this hard rock, whiles you do keep from me /The rest o th island (1. 2. 345-7). Calibans important grievance is how Prospero has stripped Caliban of his autonomy and his control over the island. The central grievance for many colonized people is how the colonizer strips self-direction and control over ancestral lands from the colonized. Richard Hakluyt in his essay Reasons for Colonization, written in 1584 about the Virginia colonial project (125), succinctly describes the intentions of the English imperialismThe end of this voyage to North America are these 1. ) To plant Christian religion. 2) To traffic. 3. ) To Conquer. Or, to do all three (129). As demonstrated e arlier, Caliban is unhappy with his conquered status, a status Prospero confirms when he rebuts Calibans grievances, Thou most lying slave (my emphasis, 1. 2. 347). Prospero interestingly goes on to indicate his own inherent transcendence and Calibans inherent inferiority, a privileging central to any colonial situation.Prospero states, I have used thee, / nastiness as thou are, with humane care (1. 2. 348-9). Prospero ascribes the quality of filth to Caliban and humane-ness to his own actions. As the Hakluyt states, the first objective of the colonizer is to plant Christian religion or bring morality to the heathen indigenous people. Prosperos ultimate argument for supplanting Caliban evokes the moral order the colonizer supposedly brings, for Prospero states the reason he has enslaved Caliban is because Caliban sought to violate/ The honor of Prosperos child (1. 2. 350-1).From the perspective of the colonizer Caliban seek to rape Miranda however, from the perspective of the lon e indigenous person Caliban attempt to propagate his culture O ho O ho Wouldt had been done / Thou didst prevent me I had peopled else / This isle with Calibans (1. 2. 352-4). While this relativism does not absolve Caliban of attempting to forcefully procreate with Miranda, it does not absolve Prospero of enslaving Caliban either. Unfortunately, Prospero uses one crime to justify another crime Calibans attempted rape leads to his enslavement at the hands of Prospero.Furthermore, when Miranda tries to instill Caliban with a sense of guilt over his attempted rape, she states she endowed Calibans purposes / With words that made them known (1. 2. 360-1). However, by endowing Caliban with the language of the colonizer, Miranda has merely indoctrinated Caliban in the ideology of the colonizer in which Caliban, the colonized, occupies the margin. The colonizers language is a burden upon the colonized, for in order for the two groups to go along the onus is on the colonized to learn the c olonizers language.Caliban concurs with this onus when he says, You taught me language, and my profit ont / Is I know how to curse. The red plague rid you / For learning me your language (1. 2. 366-8). Another privileging in the imperial situation is the language and culture of the colonizer over the language and culture of colonized. For instance, Thomas Harriot exhausted time in the Virginia colony and wrote about the Algonquian people in Brief and True insure of the New Found Land of Virginia his English contemporaries criticized him for learning the language of the Algonquians (Bertram 59).Bertram notes, the English feared much more than foreign languages, as contact with foreign cultures inspired probing questions about cultural identity (59). Mirandas effacement of Calibans language demonstrates her fear of foreign language and culture. Just as Caliban threatens Mirandas carnal sanctity, he also threatens her cultural sanctity by not communicating in the controlled discour se. Clearly, the conflict between Caliban and Prospero in The Tempest metaphorically represents the imperialistic conflicts between the colonized and the colonizer.Lastly, although Caliban can metaphorically represent the colonized Other, did Shakespeare intend Caliban to represent indigenous Americans specifically? Alden T. Vaughan in his article Shakespeares Indian The Americanization of Caliban examines the history of The Tempest analysis which attempted to see Caliban as representative of Native Americans. Vaughan concludes, If an intentionalist reading is insisted upon, and if early interpretations of Caliban are taken into account, his principal prototype was probably the European wild man of Renaissance literature and iconography (Shakespeares, 153).In addition, Ronald Takaki offers in The Tempest in the Wilderness the context surrounding the first performance of the play also, he explains how Shakespeares audience might have perceived the character of Caliban. Takaki explai ns the following The timing of The Tempest was crucial it was first performed after the English invasion of Ireland but before the colonization of New England, after John smiths arrival in Virginia but before the beginning of the tobacco economy, and after the first contacts with Indians but before full-scale warfare against them.This was an era when the English were encountering other peoples and deli tastefuling the boundary between civilization and savagery. The social constructions of both these terms were dynamically developing in three sitesIreland, Virginia, and New England. (143) If Shakespeares audience aphorism Caliban as more man than monster, they likely conflated all known savage Others in their perception of Caliban.When Prospero says, This thing of darkness Caliban I / Acknowledge mine (5. 1. 275-6), Caliban could seem more monster than man, darkness meaning evil, or Caliban could seem more man than monster, darkness referring to skin color. It is unclear what Shak espeare intended however, how people interpret Shakespeare is entirely another matter.Although Vaughan dismisses the notion Shakespeare intended Caliban to be Native American, he supports the notion that Caliban can metaphorically be seen as Native American, stating, metaphoric readings of The Tempest have had equal legitimacy with the older literal sexual climax (Shakespeares, 153). There are scholars who have a stake in seeing Caliban as solely meant to be Native Americans.An immediate thread of their inquiry is Calibans name, which might be an anagram from a class spelling of the word canibal. John F. Moffitt and Santiago Sebastian in their text O Brave New People The European Invention of The American Indian describe how the lurid European popular perception quickly associated cannibalism with the inhabitants of the New World. Moffit and Sebastian describe the following Cannibalism was also the specific subcultural attribute of the aborigines of the Other World that, as might be expected, some European illustrators found most noteworthy.In a crude woodcut, a German print of 1505representing the earliest European depiction of American Indianscannibalism becomes the foremost collective characteristic of the newly described peoples. (264-5) While Europeans, according to Vaughan, were familiar with the concept of anthropophagi, or eaters of human flesh, such people were considered fabulous (People, 15). Vaughan goes on to note, So prominent did some accounts make the eating of human flesh that the word cannibal, from the Carib Indians who presumptively practiced the vile custom, gradually replaced the older, more awkward, term for eaters of human flesh (People, 15).Curiously, if Shakespeare meant to evoke the sensational quality of cannibalism ascribed to Native Americans by Europeans in his character Caliban, he does not develop the trait in the play. Conversely, if Caliban does not represent Native Americans, certainly the European characters within th e play perceive his usefulness like Native Americans during the early 17th century. The play mentions dead or alive a Native American is remunerative for displaying in England. Additionally, Trinculo notes, the English will / lay out ten to see a dead Indian. (2. 2. 31-32).Later, Stephano schemes to capture Caliban, or as Vaughan euphemistically refers to Native Americans kidnapped by Europeans, coerced American envoys (People, 12). Stephano states, If I can recover him Caliban and keep him objurgate and get / to Naples with him, hes a present for any emperor that / ever trod on neats leather (2. 2. 65-7). Although Caliban might have the same display value as a Native American in England, this fact does not necessarily make Caliban Native American. Within The Tempest, there is not enough strong evidence to support the reading that Shakespeare meant Caliban to be Native American.If Shakespeare intended Caliban to represent Native American then Leslie Fieldler notes, Calibans attemp t on Mirandas virtue makes him the first nonwhite rapist in white mans literature his freedom song is the first American poem and when he guzzles too much of Stephanos wine, Caliban is the first drunken Indian in Western literature (Vaughan, Shakespeares, 148). Native Americans struggle enough with poor representation in American society there is not a pressing need to demonstrate Shakespeare intended Caliban to be solely Native American if it results in special derision.In contrast, Jeffrey L. Hantman in Calibans Own Voice American Indian Views of the Other in colonial Virginia summarizes the 20th century importance of Caliban as a universal indigenous voice, He is African, and he is Caribbean. He has been a native of Madagascar, Quebec, Cuba, Nigeria, Kenya, and Zambia. Today, he is sometime enslaved, and psychologically dependent, but he is also a guerilla, a revolutionary, and a hero (71). Who Shakespeare intended Caliban to be is a non-issue for those who identify with Caliba n.If people find an ledger entry into identifying with Caliban, then certainly Caliban becomes them as much as they become Caliban. Although it would be erroneous to claim Shakespeare meant The Tempest as an allegory for English Imperialism in the New World and Caliban solely represents Native Americans, the play does metaphorically represent English imperialism and encapsulates English sentiments towards the New World during the time of the plays cultural production.A brief overview of Englands New World exploration and colonization demonstrates how the English perception of the New World and Native Americans transformed during the development of English imperialism. Within the play, Gonzalos interests in the island and his plantation scheme illustrate the English imperial yearning for the New World and an opportunity to develop a society closer to a natural state. Furthermore, the first exchange between Caliban and Prospero encapsulate the conflicts that mar imperial relationship between indigenous people and the colonizer.Moreover, although Caliban does not represent specifically Native Americans, he can broadly represent all subjugated indigenous people. There are many congruencies between events in The Tempest and events during the late 16th and 17th century English imperialism. The Tempest is an example where Shakespeare was not necessarily predicting a incoming outcome but more likely articulating the trajectory of a present English course. Works Cited Bertram, Benjamin. The Time is out of Joint Skepticism in Shakespeares England. Newark, NJ University of Delaware Press, 2004. De Montaigne, Michel.From Of the Cannibals. William Shakespeare The Tempest A outcome carry in diminutive Controversy. Ed. Gerald Graff and James Phelan. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2000. 119-20. Hakluyt, Richard. Reasons for Colonization. William Shakespeare The Tempest A vitrine Study in Critical Controversy. Ed. Gerald Graff and James Phelan. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2000. 125-34. Hantman, Jeffrey L. Calibans Own Voice American Indian Views of the Other in colonial Virginia. New Literary History 23. 1 (1992) 69-81. JSTOR. Winona State University, Darrell W. Krueger Lib., Winona, MN. 3 Mar. 2007 . Moffitt, John F. , and Santiago Sebastian. O Brave New People The European Invention of the American Indian. Albuquerque, NM University of New Mexico Press, 1996. Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. William Shakespeare The Tempest A Case Study in Critical Controversy. Ed. Gerald Graff and James Phelan. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2000. 10-88. Sokol, B. J. A Brave New World of Knowledge Shakespeares the Tempest and Early Modern Epistemology. Cranbury, NJ Associated University Presses, 2003. Takaki, Ronald. The Tempest in the Wilderness. William Shakespeare The Tempest A Case Study in Critical Controversy. Ed. Gerald Graff and James Phelan. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2000. 140-172. Vaughan, Alden T. People of Wonder England Encounters the New Worlds Nat ives. New World of Wonders European Images of the Americas, 1492-1700. Ed. Rachel Doggett, et al. Seattle University of Washington Press, 1992. -. Shakespeares Indian The Americanization of Caliban. Shakespeare Quarterly 39. 2 (1988) 137-153. JSTOR. Winona State University, Darrell W. Krueger Lib. , Winona, MN. 3 Mar. 2007 . 1 Throughout the paper instead of simply using the term natives, I use indigenous people because the term natives carries negative imperialistic connotations. 2 I use the term New World provisionally in order to describe the dichotomy between Europe, the supposed Old World, and their realization of the Americas, which they dubbed the New World. 3 While some scholars have argued that Shakespeare intended Caliban to be representative of Native American, this intentionality is problematic. I will examine this later in the paper.